https://www.thestar.com/sports/world...h-america.html
It's expected that 3 cities in Canada will split 10 games.
BMO Field capacity will be at least 45,500.
I would expect that a new stadium makes more sense than adapting current BMO Field.
Printable View
https://www.thestar.com/sports/world...h-america.html
It's expected that 3 cities in Canada will split 10 games.
BMO Field capacity will be at least 45,500.
I would expect that a new stadium makes more sense than adapting current BMO Field.
Only 10 games are being played in Canada. Toronto will be lucky if they get 4 games Maximum.
BMO Can be increased to 45k in soccer configuration with Templeton stands.
According to CTV News, BMO will need to be expanded to 60,000 with temporary seats and the Olympic Stadium in Montreal will require a $400,000,000 upgrade for the World Cup.
The Big Owe, which was estimated to cost $71 million in 1971, ended up costing $1.1 billion in debt. It was finally paid off thirty years after the 1976 Montreal Olympics in 2006. Now the stadium will produce a new Big Owe. Maybe we should move the Centennial Flame on Parliament Hill to the Big Owe to symbolize when the new debt might be paid off.
Works out well for MLSE I suppose since they were planning to upgrade BMO Field, and now they'll get some Government Funding. Canada won't get any of the playoff games, so minimum requirement is 40,000. From my understanding Bill Manning was talking about going 35,000 permanent with the ability to go slight over 45,000 with temps. That may be too big for TFC and the Argos in the long run IMO.
Who would build a new sports stadium in Toronto?Quote:
Originally Posted by 1971GreyCup
And for what purpose? 3 soccer matches?
Montreal should try to get a new downtown stadium. Hello Expos!
With all the money the federal gov't will be giving to upgrade the Toronto/Montreal stadiums for a handful of World Cup soccer games, do you suppose they may find a bit more to help build a stadium in the Maritimes for the CFL?
That’s such a good idea that it will never happen! Next person to see Randy Ambrosie should ask him. He’ll be at one of the opening day games.Quote:
Originally Posted by Shatto
Russia built 12 (?) stadia for 80 games. I don’t know the funding model, or if FIFA share the billions to the host cities. Can anyone enlighten us?Quote:
Originally Posted by PullTogether73
FIFA won’t be playing World Cup matches in temporary facilities. I suspect a new build in the parking lot south of BMO Field makes more sense. Or TFC and the Argos play on the road for a couple of seasons.
Olympic and World Cup games, rightly or wrongly, are always sold to the public on the value added infrastructure that is left behind.
Things could change between now and 2026, but a big part of the reason the United bid was rated so highly by FIFA was because the United bid is using existing infrastructure to host the games (Bid has 3 in Canada, 3 in Mexico, and 17 in the U.S; 10 will be selected from the U.S). No new stadiums as of now are planned.
As part of the bid book, the games in Canada will be played in Olympic Stadium (Bid Book capacity: 55,822, expandable to 73,000); Commonwealth Stadium (Bid book capacity: 56,418); and BMO Field (Bid book capacity of 45,500). As I stated previously: MLSE was planning to update BMO Field (particularly the West Stands, Endzones, and Suites), so this works out for them because it should ensure some Government funding. Permanent seating for BMO should be around 35,000 for soccer; which would lead to the 45,500 capacity with temp seats. CFL set-up should be around 30,000 seats, and expandable to 40,000+ for a potential Grey Cup.
Halfiax will not be receiving any World Cup money for a stadium due to them not being a part of the bid, but that doesn't mean LeBlanc & Co. can't or won't ask for any funding when the time is right. It'll just be separate from the World Cup Bid.
Those Russian stadiums will be used by Russian club teams. Plus they've got an authouritarian leader who has the power to spend however much he wants on whatever he wants.Quote:
Originally Posted by 1971GreyCup
Canada is getting nothing after the round of 16, and I bet Toronto only gets group games, so FIFA can probably live with temporary seats for that.
Canada and Mexico will only get Group stage games. From the newly expanded Round of 32 (which debuts in 2026) and on: all games are played in the U.S.
Remind me to be out of the city in 2026.
Quote:
Originally Posted by R.J
Mainly temporary stands, but I hope they can re-build the west stands and have a concourse between upper and lower decks like TDP and THF.Quote:
"The biggest unanswered questions focus on the cost of hosting the event. A funding partnership is expected between all three levels of government, with the City’s share expected to be in the vicinity of $30-45 million.
Lamport would be used for a practice facility for the World Cup teams, all practice facilities would have grass.
The Big Owe in Montreal was already getting a new roof, the only renovations there will be the grass field.
For Canada hosting some World Cup games, it's not a big cost for taxpayers. The big bonus is that World Cup brings in a lot of fans from other countries.
http://urbantoronto.ca/news/2018/06/what-does-fifa-2026-have-store-toronto
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1971GreyCup
Agreed that Olympic/World Cup games are sold on their lasting infrastructure development in addition to the immediate $ influx during the games.Quote:
Originally Posted by argolio
But recent experience has shown that this is largely a fallacy in practice.
Ask the Greek government about the long term infrastructure uses after they last hosted the Olympics. My understanding is that most are on their way to becoming ruins like the Acropolis!
Russia invested heavily in the Sochi Olympics. The ski events apparently were held on facilities built below the frost line, leaving no use for their intended purpose after the Olympics.
IMO the costs of hosting these events far outweighs the benefits, and I see little value in being involved other than some short term chest pumping marketing benefit.
If it results in long term improvements to BMO Field, as an Argos STH I would welcome that, but not at any exorbitant cost to the city (and how my tax dollars are spent).
According to a commentator during one of yesterday's games, that particular Russian stadium is using temporary stands for the World Cup.
We don't know the details yet but if the feds/province have stated $35 Million towards the upgrade then maybe MLSE will put up money towards the upgrade.Quote:
Originally Posted by PullTogether73
MLSE has already spent $100 Million on BMO. If they could match that funding the end zone seats could be permanent, re-build the west side with an upper deck. They could be then thinking about the NFL.
Upgrade to Lamport for the Argos
There won't be any NFL coming to Toronto any time soon without a non corporation willing to put up at the very least 2 billion dollars. Not a good time to get an ROI on that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Flutie
If it ever came it would likely kill the Argos and slowly throttle Flutie's TFC of publicity and they would start to wither and look more bush league than they are now. The NFL would never go to BMO unless it was totally transformed to 65k seats which would be highly unrealistic and would drive TFC fans totally round the twist because they would be a total after thought in that venue. You couldn't get 65k people in Toronto to go see second rate soccer on a regular basis. As for Argos going to Lamport that would have to be 20k seats at least.
LOL - thought that would get the expected reaction.Quote:
Originally Posted by rdavies
But who knows what will happen by 2026 but having a few World Cup games with little cost to taxpayers is great for the city. Thousands of foreign visitors.