Originally Posted by
OV Argo
Yeah seems unlikely; HOWEVER - this year's NFL season has seen a record number of rookie QBs (plus a couple of other journeymen with weak resumes) forced to start, and some of them have been next to useless; so, there could possibly be some new thinking there about looking far & wide for new QBs - maybe, perhaps, possibly ? Ok - still doubtful. And I really doubt an NFL GM has to worry too much about which QBs they sign to be #3 camp competition. Kelly signed as a starter - like Warren Moon or Dieter Brock were right out of the CFL back when NFL thinking was different - now that might cause some howls of WTF . IF Kelly believes he has a shot at anything other than a #3 job right away, he, or his agent, is dreaming.
Little question in my mind that Kelly is a far superior QB talent to some of these stiffs who have been trotted out this season; but then again so is Nathan Rourke and he signed with a team where he had little hope to progress to #2.