I agree that those two issues -- especially the change to clock rules -- are the most likely cause of this change. As I've written before, in the 1980s both teams typically ran 55 to 65 offensive plays in a game. Now it is not unheard of for teams to run as few as 45, and as many as 55 is fairly rare. That's anywhere from 10 to 40 fewer offensive plays in a game. I plan to someday do additional research on this, and try to find out precisely when -- and why -- clock rules were changed to allow the game clock to keep running before the 20-second clock started, and during converts. My suspicion is that it is a result of coaches demanding more time to make situation substitutions, and the relaxed TV regulations rules that allowed networks to show many more minutes of commercials per hour. In order to accommodate all the TV timeouts and not have games run 3.5-4 hours, the clock had to be left running.
A lot of people think the CFL is a much faster-paced game than the NFL, with the 20-second clock compared to the NFL's 45, but I've watched the clock at times during Argo home games and it's very common for there to be 40-45 seconds of game clock between the end of one play and the next snap. And I note that the Patriots actually ran off 91 plays in a regulation-time game last season, thanks to their constant no-huddle offence. I would really, really like to see CFL teams start doing this -- the more plays, the better.
End of rant.
Bookmarks