That's what this thread says:
http://www.ign.com/boards/threads/cf...spn.453253659/
That's what this thread says:
http://www.ign.com/boards/threads/cf...spn.453253659/
I'm not a soccer fan or expert by any means but when I first saw TFC play it looked like NCAA level soccer!
Except NCAA is better.
No surprise here. When I first moved to New York , MSG2 used to pick up the America One feed of the TSN Friday night game. The feed of a feed picture quality literally looked like someone smeared Vaseline all over my tv screen. Anyhow, the ratings at that time were a very impressive 60 thousand in the NY market alone. And the quality of the TV package has improved so much since 08.
Americans like their football. I don't understand why anyone is surprised by this except if they are looking to use it to take a shot at MLS.
TORONTO ARGONAUTS FOOTBALL CLUB
GREY CUP CHAMPIONS: 1914, 1921, 1933, 1937, 1938, 1945, 1946, 1947, 1950, 1952, 1983, 1991, 1996, 1997, 2004, 2012, 2017, 2022
These comments on the MLS are silly and ultimately wrong. I've just Googled up most of the rankings for the summer from the same blog source and there's weeks where 300K to 400K were watching MLS (although it definitely drops lower as well). The CFL consistently got +200K viewers for it's five weeks with 350,000 in its first and best week. The CFL numbers seem strong enough to merit renewal. We should be happy about that rather than wishing the worst for soccer.
Interesting thread argolio...good research.
The very title of the thread is a put down to MLS.Can you please point out to me who on this thread was "wishing the worst for soccer"? Or are you reading minds now?
MLS ratings were as high as 346 000 in late August according to the site that the thread that Argolio posted used. It is true that the CFL whenever shown during the same week as MLS had the higher ratings at least for the few weeks that I could find.
TORONTO ARGONAUTS FOOTBALL CLUB
GREY CUP CHAMPIONS: 1914, 1921, 1933, 1937, 1938, 1945, 1946, 1947, 1950, 1952, 1983, 1991, 1996, 1997, 2004, 2012, 2017, 2022
The question I'd ask is why the MLS specifically is being singled out for comparison although that is more a question for cutechemist42 on IGN rather than Argolio.
TORONTO ARGONAUTS FOOTBALL CLUB
GREY CUP CHAMPIONS: 1914, 1921, 1933, 1937, 1938, 1945, 1946, 1947, 1950, 1952, 1983, 1991, 1996, 1997, 2004, 2012, 2017, 2022
I'm not necessarily dwelling on the fact that the CFL was compared to ratings for another sport altogether, but why the original thread on IGN singled out MLS. I don't think it's a question were going to have answered either.
TORONTO ARGONAUTS FOOTBALL CLUB
GREY CUP CHAMPIONS: 1914, 1921, 1933, 1937, 1938, 1945, 1946, 1947, 1950, 1952, 1983, 1991, 1996, 1997, 2004, 2012, 2017, 2022
Look, I just was asking who on this thread was "wishing the worst for soccer", and how the poster came to that conclusion. I still have yet to receive a logical answer to it.
Why is it that everytime MLS is mentioned in a thread over here, the MLS fans need to make more out of it than it is?
It's us vs the rest of the country
I'm not an MLS fan. I've been to one game live and never watched on television. Not that that should matter.Originally Posted by AngeloV
I just find it odd on this forum how many people seem to have inferiority/superiority issues with regards to the MLS. Why does beating that league constitute validation for the CFL? I could just as easily point to the same blog and announce: "CFL loses out big time to NASCAR in the United States." Would I really be proving anything?
Bookmarks