Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    Bleeds Double Blue
    Points: 66,643, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 12.0%
    Achievements:
    OverdriveCreated Album picturesVeteran50000 Experience Points
    R.J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    6,655
    Points
    66,643
    Level
    100

    Big news in the NHL today

    According to Bob McKenzie - Stamkos will stay in Tampa on a reported 8 year $8.5 million per contract.
    The Oilers traded Taylor Hall to the New Jersey Devils for Defenceman Adam Larsson.
    Montreal Canadiens trade P.K Subban to the Nashville Predators for Shea Weber.

    Stamkos staying in Tampa makes sense, and on the surface Larsson for Hall looks like a good deal to me, but Weber for Subban is nuts IMO. Poile just traded one of the top 3 defencemen in the league for P.K.Subban ? I know a lot of people think that Subban is entertaining and I'm sure Canadiens fans probably aren't too happy, but Subban is a defensive liabilty. Yeah, he can score, but he can also lose you games. Weber on the other hand is a shut down defensemen, who scores goals with his killer shot, is a respected leader, very smart with the puck and has been top notch in the playoffs. Am I the only one who thinks Nashville made a big mistake here ?

  2. #2
    Bleeds Double Blue
    Points: 31,773, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 54.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    Argo57's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    7,147
    Points
    31,773
    Level
    100
    Quote Originally Posted by SnowRogue View Post
    According to Bob McKenzie - Stamkos will stay in Tampa on a reported 8 year $8.5 million per contract.
    The Oilers traded Taylor Hall to the New Jersey Devils for Defenceman Adam Larsson.
    Montreal Canadiens trade P.K Subban to the Nashville Predators for Shea Weber.

    Stamkos staying in Tampa makes sense, and on the surface Larsson for Hall looks like a good deal to me, but Weber for Subban is nuts IMO. Poile just traded one of the top 3 defencemen in the league for P.K.Subban ? I know a lot of people think that Subban is entertaining and I'm sure Canadiens fans probably aren't too happy, but Subban is a defensive liabilty. Yeah, he can score, but he can also lose you games. Weber on the other hand is a shut down defensemen, who scores goals with his killer shot, is a respected leader, very smart with the puck and has been top notch in the playoffs. Am I the only one who thinks Nashville made a big mistake here ?
    Oilers didn't get enough for Hall.
    Good trade for Montreal.
    Stamkos could have got more in free agency.
    In many ways I'm glad Stamkos didn't sign in Toronto, I think they need to stay the course by continuing to build through the draft and possibly go after a big free agent type (Tavares) in a couple of years when they have developed a better supporting cast.
    Toronto Argonauts
    18 Time World Champions

  3. #3
    Bleeds Double Blue
    Points: 39,853, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 75.0%
    Achievements:
    VeteranOverdrive25000 Experience Points
    AngeloV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Thornhill
    Posts
    11,841
    Points
    39,853
    Level
    100
    Time will tell. Nashville is a better all around team than Montreal, so it is possible Subban looks better in Nashville and Weber not quite as good in Montreal. Really, Weber also played with much better defence partners in (Jossi) Nashville than he will in Montreal. If he plays with slow as hell Andre Markov, he may end up looking not as good as Subban.
    .
    It's us vs the rest of the country

  4. #4
    Bleeds Double Blue
    Points: 39,853, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 75.0%
    Achievements:
    VeteranOverdrive25000 Experience Points
    AngeloV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Thornhill
    Posts
    11,841
    Points
    39,853
    Level
    100
    Quote Originally Posted by Argo57 View Post
    In many ways I'm glad Stamkos didn't sign in Toronto, I think they need to stay the course by continuing to build through the draft and possibly go after a big free agent type (Tavares) in a couple of years when they have developed a better supporting cast.
    Assuming of course Tavaras goes to free agency. I don't see it happening either.
    It's us vs the rest of the country

  5. #5
    Bleeds Double Blue
    Points: 31,773, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 54.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    Argo57's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    7,147
    Points
    31,773
    Level
    100
    Quote Originally Posted by AngeloV View Post
    Assuming of course Tavaras goes to free agency. I don't see it happening either.
    Who knows, point being signing a big cash superstar at this point makes little sense for the Leafs, build a solid foundation through the draft then add the finishing pieces (if necessary).
    Toronto Argonauts
    18 Time World Champions

  6. #6
    Argo Fan
    Points: 4,039, Level: 40
    Level completed: 45%, Points required for next Level: 111
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    1000 Experience PointsVeteran

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    58
    Points
    4,039
    Level
    40
    Quote Originally Posted by Argo57 View Post
    Who knows, point being signing a big cash superstar at this point makes little sense for the Leafs, build a solid foundation through the draft then add the finishing pieces (if necessary).
    I agree. I believe the Leafs would be far better served targeting a stud defenseman (via the draft) and building up their overall depth on defense with some high picks over the next few years. So far, they've done an admirable job of stocking young, skilled forwards and have acquired their best goaltending prospect in years (Andersen). I hope they stay the course and resist the temptation to make a big splash by signing a high-profile free agent (Tavares) whose contract demands would likely make it difficult, if not impossible, to satisfy the future salary requirements needed to keep together a good young team on the rise.

  7. #7
    Bleeds Double Blue
    Points: 66,643, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 12.0%
    Achievements:
    OverdriveCreated Album picturesVeteran50000 Experience Points
    R.J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    6,655
    Points
    66,643
    Level
    100
    Quote Originally Posted by Argo57 View Post
    Oilers didn't get enough for Hall.
    Good trade for Montreal.
    Stamkos could have got more in free agency.
    In many ways I'm glad Stamkos didn't sign in Toronto, I think they need to stay the course by continuing to build through the draft and possibly go after a big free agent type (Tavares) in a couple of years when they have developed a better supporting cast.
    I agree, the Oilers didn't get enough for Hall, but I think part of the problem is that the other teams gm's know that the Oilers need D, so they have the upper hand. IMO Chiarelli is a terrible GM; Yes, he was Bryan Murray's number 2 (another overrated GM IMO - good coach though), but in Boston he screwed up the team within a couple of years. Now in Edmonton and aside from getting lucky with McJesus; what exactly has he done ? Larsson could turn out to be a solid top 4 guy......... eventually.

    Good trade for Montreal, but unless Weber is slowing down; I don't see why Poile would have made this trade. It's makes a lot of sense for Bergevin and the Canadiens though.

    I think the Leafs and Leaf fans need to stop thinking that home grown boys will come home when they hit free agency and focus on building the team with youth and minor tweaks here and there via trades and free agency. IMO there's no need to spend ridiculous amounts of money on free agents. Matthews is a very good player for the team to build around (IMO he's to McDavid what Toews is to Crosby) and IMO they (the Leafs) need a Brandon Sutter/Ryan Kesler type to be the number 2.

  8. #8
    Bleeds Double Blue
    Points: 39,853, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 75.0%
    Achievements:
    VeteranOverdrive25000 Experience Points
    AngeloV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Thornhill
    Posts
    11,841
    Points
    39,853
    Level
    100
    Quote Originally Posted by Argo57 View Post
    Who knows, point being signing a big cash superstar at this point makes little sense for the Leafs, build a solid foundation through the draft then add the finishing pieces (if necessary).
    I would have had no problem adding a 26 year old star without having to give up anything from your foundation. It would not have slowed down the process at all. Maybe now Tampa will not be able to afford Hedman next year.
    It's us vs the rest of the country

  9. #9
    Bleeds Double Blue
    Points: 31,773, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 54.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    Argo57's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    7,147
    Points
    31,773
    Level
    100
    Quote Originally Posted by AngeloV View Post
    I would have had no problem adding a 26 year old star without having to give up anything from your foundation. It would not have slowed down the process at all. Maybe now Tampa will not be able to afford Hedman next year.
    Yes and a few years down the road you'd be trading some of your other core players for cap reasons.
    Who mentioned that it would slow the process?
    To me a signing like this would be a couple of years too early, perhaps Stamkos looked at the Leafs roster and the development stage they are at and said no thanks.
    It also could be possible that the Leafs were only mildly interested for future cap reasons as well.
    Toronto Argonauts
    18 Time World Champions

  10. #10
    Banned
    Points: 27,855, Level: 98
    Level completed: 51%, Points required for next Level: 495
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    OverdriveVeteran25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Douro Dummer Ontario
    Posts
    5,188
    Points
    27,855
    Level
    98
    Jersey did very well getting Hall.

    I like PK and Nashville won that trade. They got tons of talent and a younger player. How long before PK puts out a country album?

    Leafs will have their own super star, they don't need Stamkos.

  11. #11
    Bleeds Double Blue
    Points: 55,478, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.6%
    Achievements:
    OverdriveVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    ArgoRavi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    8,696
    Points
    55,478
    Level
    100
    Quote Originally Posted by AngeloV View Post
    Time will tell. Nashville is a better all around team than Montreal, so it is possible Subban looks better in Nashville and Weber not quite as good in Montreal. Really, Weber also played with much better defence partners in (Jossi) Nashville than he will in Montreal. If he plays with slow as hell Andre Markov, he may end up looking not as good as Subban.
    Good points, AV. I personally can't understand the deal from Montreal's perspective. Subban is only entering the prime years of his career while Weber is likely heading into the downside of his. The sky is the limit as far as Subban's potential goes as well. Financially, the deal doesn't really benefit Montreal either. I suspect that this will be a deal that Canadiens fans point to as a bad one for decades to come.
    Cameron Dukes + Dan Adeboboye + Kevin Mital + David Ungerer + Damonte Coxie + DaVaris Daniels + Dejon Brissett = Unstoppable Force

  12. #12
    Bleeds Double Blue
    Points: 31,773, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 54.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    Argo57's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    7,147
    Points
    31,773
    Level
    100
    Quote Originally Posted by SnowRogue View Post
    I agree, the Oilers didn't get enough for Hall, but I think part of the problem is that the other teams gm's know that the Oilers need D, so they have the upper hand. IMO Chiarelli is a terrible GM; Yes, he was Bryan Murray's number 2 (another overrated GM IMO - good coach though), but in Boston he screwed up the team within a couple of years. Now in Edmonton and aside from getting lucky with McJesus; what exactly has he done ? Larsson could turn out to be a solid top 4 guy......... eventually.

    Good trade for Montreal, but unless Weber is slowing down; I don't see why Poile would have made this trade. It's makes a lot of sense for Bergevin and the Canadiens though.

    I think the Leafs and Leaf fans need to stop thinking that home grown boys will come home when they hit free agency and focus on building the team with youth and minor tweaks here and there via trades and free agency. IMO there's no need to spend ridiculous amounts of money on free agents. Matthews is a very good player for the team to build around (IMO he's to McDavid what Toews is to Crosby) and IMO they (the Leafs) need a Brandon Sutter/Ryan Kesler type to be the number 2.
    Chiarelli's reputation was cemented by one idiotic phone call by then Leafs GM Brian Burke.
    Toronto Argonauts
    18 Time World Champions

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts