I guess Edmonton, Hamilton and Winnipeg disagree as they are all under contract to return in 2017. How does a redshirt freshman start at receiver at University of South Carolina in the ACC and the go on to hang around the NFL for five seasons with his bad attitude. To be honest, I would say the frustration must have rained supreme on the SM team. I believe in 2017 receivers wouldn't even recommend challenges, because they new what happened to those who did and the result seemed to be quite dis-functional. I am pretty sure that Jim Barker wasn't looking for 4 troublemakers when he scouted the terrible four.
I took the position after Week #1 that big changes were required after the thumping we took at hands of the Ticats during Week #1. Many disagreed. We had a top quality coach and a top GM. Patience was required.
The season turned into a circus after Week 16 and the GM/HC summariiy cut 1/4 of offense. Timing was great as it was just before we played the CFL powerhouse Stampeders. By the way, we got zilch for these players. I was then told, no one would pickup these guys. Except they were all four picked up?? Now I hear they didn't a lot of playing time.
And the final straw for me was when the GM and HC decided just 5 days later that there still as a chance to get to the Grey Cup in-spite of the self-inflicted mortal wound of Week 16. A desperate trade for a reportedly gunslinger QB was acquired after trading future assets. This previously benched QB, with a hefty contract would be available in the offseason. To add to the problem, the receivers had just been sent packing!
I guess it all circles back to the terrible four. I fear the Argos have a rough road ahead, and many players will have lots to prove when they come back to town.
Bookmarks