I remain convinced that if he is not a starting LB by next year at the latest, he will be up against the reality that a guy who is three-four years younger and $200-300k cheaper can be brought in to play special teams and back up at LB. That's not a knock on Greenwood -- he has done extremely well to date and deserves to remain on the Chiefs roster at this point. But I don't believe he is in a different category than any other non-starter in the NFL -- he can easily be replaced by a younger, cheaper player. It happens all the time in football to backups/special team players. The contract the Chiefs gave him is not somehow indicative of special plans for him, IMO. It's not that big a contract bny NFL standards, and of course it is not guaranteed.