Major questions remain about the financing of a stadium in Halifax. As far as I can see it doesn't add up for the taxpayer.
http://3downnation.com/2018/10/31/fi...dium-proposal/A football franchise and stadium is a step closer to reality, but serious questions remain about the financial risk involved for the municipality. Halifax regional council voted unanimously in favour of a staff report on a business case analysis of the stadium proposal on Tuesday. The motion passed will also see municipal staff work with the provincial government on a long list of necessary legislative amendments and potential funding sources. It also means the proponents, Maritime Football Limited Partnership (MFLP), will start consulting the public on their plans for a 24,000-seat stadium in Shannon Park in Dartmouth to host a CFL expansion team for the 2021 season. ...
Building the stadium would cost between $170 million and $190 million, but it’s still unclear who’s footing that bill.
LeBlanc said MFLP would take on the operational risk of the stadium, meaning the ongoing costs once it’s built. He pegged those at $3 million annually or more. “We plan on being the sole group at risk in regard to the operations of the facility,” he said.
The financing risk, not so much. “I didn’t say we’d take on the risk,” he said. “We would take on the operational risk. We were very clear we would take on the operational risk. That’s not the financing risk. We said we would take on the operational risk.”
LeBlanc wouldn’t say whether MFLP would borrow the money. “The conversation about how the money will flow, who will sign up for it, those are to be determined. We don’t have answers for that for you right now,” he said.
He wouldn’t say whether MFLP would need either the municipal or provincial government to guarantee the loan. “We would need government involved at the table in some fashion in regards to how the loan structure is put together. I don’t have an answer for you on that,” he said. And LeBlanc wouldn’t say whether MFLP would need to borrow the money at the province’s financing rates. “I don’t have an answer for you on the specifics of the financing.”
LeBlanc said MFLP is willing to contribute to the capital funding, but “those are ongoing discussions, so the last thing I would do is tip my hat at this point in regards to what we would be contributing.” The key question now, according to LeBlanc is, “What is the acceptable risk level from each level involved, including ourselves?”
During Tuesday’s council meeting, chief administrative office Jacques Dubé told councillors that the municipality wouldn’t own the stadium or the debt. In fact, he said Halifax wouldn’t be taking on any financial risk. “We’re not looking to take construction risk. We’re not looking to take financial risk on the project,” he said. Dubé’s plan to pay for the stadium is a controversial financing model called Tax Increment Financing (TIF). The municipality would create a TIF district around the stadium, and the property taxes from the commercial development planned in that area would ostensibly pay for the debt financing costs — $9 million to $10 million annually.
It’s a similar model to one used for the Nova Centre in downtown Halifax, where council planned to pay for its share of the convention centre using the property taxes from the project as a whole. That’s not working out, but Dubé said it’ll be different this time. Dubé said he believes the TIF would bring in between $5 million and $6 million annually. To make up the remaining $4 million to $5 million, the municipality would ask the province to create a new car rental tax and increase the existing hotel marketing levy. That would require legislative change from the provincial government, as would the TIF plan, and the expedited planning process to get the stadium built.
Mayor Mike Savage said the math didn’t add up for him, but he wants more information.
Bookmarks