Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 61 to 66 of 66
  1. #61
    Bleeds Double Blue
    Points: 66,643, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 12.0%
    Achievements:
    OverdriveCreated Album picturesVeteran50000 Experience Points
    R.J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    6,655
    Points
    66,643
    Level
    100
    Quote Originally Posted by OV Argo View Post
    Wobbler might have meant top "wide-out" - in which case he is correct, IMO. Fuller did little; Malcolm Williams was barely thrown to.
    I'm shocked that Fuller was brought back, he isn't even as fast as he was previously, which was his only strength. Poor hands and route runner IMO, and unless he's running in a straight line, he's never been able to get separation.

  2. #62
    Bleeds Double Blue
    Points: 8,682, Level: 62
    Level completed: 78%, Points required for next Level: 68
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points
    Jon Gonzo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Ottawa
    Posts
    924
    Points
    8,682
    Level
    62
    Quote Originally Posted by R.J View Post
    I'm shocked that Fuller was brought back, he isn't even as fast as he was previously, which was his only strength. Poor hands and route runner IMO, and unless he's running in a straight line, he's never been able to get separation.
    He certainly looked lost last year. Hard to understand where all that promise went, but injuries can effect the confidence. I wouldn't put too much worry into it. If he doesn't come to play this time, he won't even make it out of camp. This is 'nothing ventured, nothing earned.' This guy wasn't faking it at Texas A&M, as their all time leading TD receiver and Big 10 First Team honours -- and he certainly looked extremely promising in Calgary before all those injuries.

    We shall see, but I wouldn't let it worry you. The coaches must have seen a glimmer of hope.
    Hustle hit and never quit

  3. #63
    Don
    Points: 131,221, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    OverdriveCreated Album picturesVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Will's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Thornhill
    Posts
    10,015
    Points
    131,221
    Level
    100
    Fuller is in the "no risk" category IMO. Unfortunately, the Argos receiving corps is kinda thin on proven experience beyond Green, Edwards and Coombs and I think this was the reason he was brought back.
    TORONTO ARGONAUTS FOOTBALL CLUB
    GREY CUP CHAMPIONS: 1914, 1921, 1933, 1937, 1938, 1945, 1946, 1947, 1950, 1952, 1983, 1991, 1996, 1997, 2004, 2012, 2017, 2022



  4. #64
    Bleeds Double Blue
    Points: 9,921, Level: 66
    Level completed: 68%, Points required for next Level: 129
    Overall activity: 21.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    1,096
    Points
    9,921
    Level
    66
    I will be surprised if both Tyms and Westerkamp aren't more effective than Fuller. That is, unless Fuller makes a remarkable recovery to his form of 2 or 3 years ago.

  5. #65
    Bleeds Double Blue
    Points: 39,537, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 29.0%
    Achievements:
    VeteranOverdrive25000 Experience Points
    AngeloV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Thornhill
    Posts
    11,810
    Points
    39,537
    Level
    100
    Quote Originally Posted by Shatto View Post
    I will be surprised if both Tyms and Westerkamp aren't more effective than Fuller. That is, unless Fuller makes a remarkable recovery to his form of 2 or 3 years ago.
    I agree, but I don't see a downside in bringing Fuller back for another look.
    It's us vs the rest of the country

  6. #66
    Moderator
    Points: 35,267, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 59.0%
    Achievements:
    Your first GroupOverdriveCreated Album picturesTagger Second ClassVeteran

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    4,506
    Points
    35,267
    Level
    100
    Quote Originally Posted by OV Argo View Post
    Wobbler might have meant top "wide-out" - in which case he is correct, IMO. Fuller did little; Malcolm Williams was barely thrown to.
    Yes, I meant WR specifically. Green was pretty clearly our top receiver.

    With Green, Edwards, and Coombs our receiving corps should be OK, but Posey's effectiveness helped Green, IMO. Can we replace him?
    Last edited by Wobbler; 02-20-2018 at 11:24 PM.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts