CFL and Argos looking at solution for BMO end zone turf and attendance problems

[PullTogether73]

Illegal stadium?

Yah, please do not refer to BMO Field as an "illegal stadium".
The police are not going to charge the CFL, MLSE, or the City of Toronto with a crime over the size of the field.

"Non-regulation field" is a more accurate description.
(There is nothing wrong with the stadium btw.)

[AngeloV]

Yah, please do not refer to BMO Field as an "illegal stadium".
The police are not going to charge the CFL, MLSE, or the City of Toronto with a crime over the size of the field.

"Non-regulation field" is a more accurate description.
(There is nothing wrong with the stadium btw.)

Prior to renovations at BC place in the last decade, I understand that their endzones were only 18 yards deep. It was that way for 20 years, and IMO the fact that their endzones were smaller due to construction of the stadium, made the league better. I always thought 25 yard endzones were a little too big.

[R.J]

Prior to renovations at BC place in the last decade, I understand that their endzones were only 18 yards deep. It was that way for 20 years, and IMO the fact that their endzones were smaller due to construction of the stadium, made the league better. I always thought 25 yard endzones were a little too big.

Funny thing is most people didn't even notice that BC Place had 18 yards endzone. Started making waves after the renovation in 2010-2011.

[AngeloV]

Funny thing is most people didn't even notice that BC Place had 18 yards endzone. Started making waves after the renovation in 2010-2011.

Count me among one that didn't know that until the renos.

[Ron]

Count me among one that didn't know that until the renos.

I didn't know either. I knew there was a reason I never went there. And lets not get started on why nobody should be at Edmonton games with that abomination of an endzone they have.