View Poll Results: What positional group are you most concerned with heading into 2021 season?

Voters
9. You may not vote on this poll
  • QB

    2 22.22%
  • RB

    0 0%
  • WR/SB

    0 0%
  • OL

    6 66.67%
  • DL

    0 0%
  • LB

    0 0%
  • DB

    0 0%
  • Specials

    0 0%
  • Coaching

    1 11.11%
Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    Don
    Points: 133,177, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.8%
    Achievements:
    OverdriveCreated Album picturesVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Will's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Thornhill
    Posts
    10,037
    Points
    133,177
    Level
    100

    What positional are are you most concerned with heading into the 2021 season?

    For me, I'm still not convinced about the OL.
    TORONTO ARGONAUTS FOOTBALL CLUB
    GREY CUP CHAMPIONS: 1914, 1921, 1933, 1937, 1938, 1945, 1946, 1947, 1950, 1952, 1983, 1991, 1996, 1997, 2004, 2012, 2017, 2022



  2. #2
    Bleeds Double Blue
    Points: 5,326, Level: 46
    Level completed: 88%, Points required for next Level: 24
    Overall activity: 46.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Mar 2021
    Posts
    710
    Points
    5,326
    Level
    46
    OL is the biggest question mark for me, too. I'm also concerned with the QB spot since Arbuckle, though he's looked solid, has limited experience starting games.

  3. #3
    Bleeds Double Blue
    Points: 53,698, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.7%
    Achievements:
    OverdriveVeteran50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Section 124, Row 19
    Posts
    8,797
    Points
    53,698
    Level
    100
    We'll go as far as our OL takes us, I would say. There is a lot of enticing potential among the young NATs, but only a couple of them (Campbell, maybe Bladek) would be considered established starters. I can't wait to see what Richards, Simba and some of the recent draft choices turn into, but for now there are a lot of question marks.
    Year of the Rocket: John Candy, Wayne Gretzky, a Crooked Tycoon, and the Craziest Season in Football History (https://sutherlandhousebooks.com/pro...of-the-rocket/)

    Bouncing Back: From National Joke to Grey Cup Champs (https://bit.ly/3fvip5x)

    YOTR YouTube https://bit.ly/37jtG4f
    BB YouTube https://bit.ly/2TSYPs7

  4. #4
    Bleeds Double Blue
    Points: 39,832, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 33.0%
    Achievements:
    VeteranOverdrive25000 Experience Points
    AngeloV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Thornhill
    Posts
    11,835
    Points
    39,832
    Level
    100
    My concern is a relatively inexperienced coaching staff. Rookie HC, Rookie DC in Glenn Young, and JJ as OC has had a lot of QB coach experience but not much as an OC. I have confidence in all 3, but still unproven. Regarding the O-line, MacAdoo is a great o-line coach, so I’m not as worried as some at that position. Schemes help.
    It's us vs the rest of the country

  5. #5
    Bleeds Double Blue
    Points: 27,270, Level: 97
    Level completed: 92%, Points required for next Level: 80
    Overall activity: 99.5%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Stratford
    Posts
    5,585
    Points
    27,270
    Level
    97
    Backup LS.

  6. #6
    Moderator
    Points: 35,267, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 59.0%
    Achievements:
    Your first GroupOverdriveCreated Album picturesTagger Second ClassVeteran

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    4,506
    Points
    35,267
    Level
    100
    DL and LB

    I'm concerned that they'll be TOO good - shutting down opposing offenses completely - and making the games too boring to watch.

  7. #7
    Bleeds Double Blue
    Points: 31,773, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 54.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    Argo57's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    7,147
    Points
    31,773
    Level
    100
    For me O-Line and D-Line, it all starts on the line of scrimmage on both sides which has been a weakness for this team in the recent past.
    Another factor will be how long it takes to develop team chemistry, new staff, schemes, massive roster overhaul and shortened schedule could be a factor.
    Toronto Argonauts
    18 Time World Champions

  8. #8
    Bleeds Double Blue
    Points: 10,043, Level: 66
    Level completed: 99%, Points required for next Level: 7
    Overall activity: 16.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    1,105
    Points
    10,043
    Level
    66
    Not concerned about any one positional group but rather how long will it take this team of newcomers (players and staff) to jell. The first part of the schedule is particularly challenging for the Argos and if the team doesn't jell quickly it could be behind the eight ball very early in the season.

  9. #9
    Bleeds Double Blue
    Points: 39,832, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 33.0%
    Achievements:
    VeteranOverdrive25000 Experience Points
    AngeloV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Thornhill
    Posts
    11,835
    Points
    39,832
    Level
    100
    Strange for me, i’m Not worried about how long it will take to gel. The way I see it, it’s been so long since anyone played, every team will be in the same position as far as continuity goes. I just don’t believe it will factor in.
    It's us vs the rest of the country

  10. #10
    Boatman
    Points: 16,690, Level: 82
    Level completed: 68%, Points required for next Level: 160
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    236
    Points
    16,690
    Level
    82
    My write-in vote is communications department.

  11. #11
    Bleeds Double Blue
    Points: 17,002, Level: 83
    Level completed: 31%, Points required for next Level: 348
    Overall activity: 8.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points
    argolio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    3,617
    Points
    17,002
    Level
    83
    Quote Originally Posted by Mike Hogan View Post
    My write-in vote is communications department.
    Yeah, they need better carrier pigeons.

  12. #12
    Bleeds Double Blue
    Points: 150,694, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    OverdriveVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Awards:
    Posting Award

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    13,974
    Points
    150,694
    Level
    100
    OL and DL with a bit of concern about QBs whose recent injury history around the CFL has been staggering.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts