Employee Alleged Harassment Case - Chad Kelly

[paulwoods13]

Surely all of this can be contained within a single thread? (Such as the one that has existed since the allegations first surfaced.)

[Will]

Surely all of this can be contained within a single thread? (Such as the one that has existed since the allegations first surfaced.)

Sure, however I cannot be on the site at all times to merge right away.

[paulwoods13]

Sure, however I cannot be on the site at all times to merge right away.

Understood. The comment was not aimed at mods but at those who create multiple threads on the same subject.

["Issues"Mcgee]

I'm only asking because Shawn Oakman lost his NFL opportunity on allegations that were proven false in court.

I would like to see some evidence.

[ArgoRavi]

I'm only asking because Shawn Oakman lost his NFL opportunity on allegations that were proven false in court.

I would like to see some evidence.

These kinds of investigations are rarely made public but Kelly and his lawyer(s) have access to the findings (an 87 page report). Kelly also has the ability to grieve and appeal through the CFLPA.

[Antwon]

I'm only asking because Shawn Oakman lost his NFL opportunity on allegations that were proven false in court.

I would like to see some evidence.

Obviously the leagues investigation found sufficient evidence.

["Issues"Mcgee]

Obviously the leagues investigation found sufficient evidence.

How is it obvious? What evidence is there?

[Mulder]

How is it obvious? What evidence is there?

The policy is clear that the CFL will impose sanctions when determined by the courts, police or confirmed by the perpetrator.

https://www.cfl.ca/2015/08/06/cfl-an...-women-policy/

Since, the matter is a civil case before the courts, the police are not involved and assuming the CFL is following their own policy, that leaves #3.