Quote Originally Posted by bluto View Post
IF I were an innocent party and was being defamed I would feel entitled to a public examination of my accuser.

What if this is something they'd done before? What if they had a record of past misdeeds?
What if I intended to sue for defamation?

I'm only observing that this trial by media is demonstrably one sided.

I don't think that's even a debatable point.
If this suit ever gets to court, Kelly will have every opportunity to engage in a public examination of his accuser. And he has every opportunity right this minute to sue for defamation, if he feels he has been defamed.