Considering that the o-line as currently constituted fills 42 per cent of the minimum required NAT starters, and it's supposedly a strong year for o-line talent, adding to our "depth" there seems like a foregone conclusion.
Considering that the o-line as currently constituted fills 42 per cent of the minimum required NAT starters, and it's supposedly a strong year for o-line talent, adding to our "depth" there seems like a foregone conclusion.
Year of the Rocket: John Candy, Wayne Gretzky, a Crooked Tycoon, and the Craziest Season in Football History (https://sutherlandhousebooks.com/pro...of-the-rocket/)
Bouncing Back: From National Joke to Grey Cup Champs (https://bit.ly/3fvip5x)
YOTR YouTube https://bit.ly/37jtG4f
BB YouTube https://bit.ly/2TSYPs7
A bunch of this year's O-line crop are likely going to draw some to serious NFL interest; therefore, risky to use a top draft pick on any of these guys cause they are unlikely to show up for TC and the team has other pressing needs (IMO) for Canadian talent;; if the remainder of O-linemen not going to the NFL are way better prospects than Dylan Gifffen or MacKellar or Anthony Vandal, for example, than sure maybe take one; but none of those non-NFL flight risk O-line this draft do have better college ball resumes than the above mentioned.
Year of the Rocket: John Candy, Wayne Gretzky, a Crooked Tycoon, and the Craziest Season in Football History (https://sutherlandhousebooks.com/pro...of-the-rocket/)
Bouncing Back: From National Joke to Grey Cup Champs (https://bit.ly/3fvip5x)
YOTR YouTube https://bit.ly/37jtG4f
BB YouTube https://bit.ly/2TSYPs7
Bookmarks