Quote Originally Posted by paulwoods13 View Post
Considering that the o-line as currently constituted fills 42 per cent of the minimum required NAT starters, and it's supposedly a strong year for o-line talent, adding to our "depth" there seems like a foregone conclusion.

A bunch of this year's O-line crop are likely going to draw some to serious NFL interest; therefore, risky to use a top draft pick on any of these guys cause they are unlikely to show up for TC and the team has other pressing needs (IMO) for Canadian talent;; if the remainder of O-linemen not going to the NFL are way better prospects than Dylan Gifffen or MacKellar or Anthony Vandal, for example, than sure maybe take one; but none of those non-NFL flight risk O-line this draft do have better college ball resumes than the above mentioned.