Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 20 of 438

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Bleeds Double Blue
    Points: 39,989, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 75.0%
    Achievements:
    VeteranOverdrive25000 Experience Points
    AngeloV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Thornhill
    Posts
    11,865
    Points
    39,989
    Level
    100
    Quote Originally Posted by SnowRogue View Post
    I wanted to keep Boyd too, but the problem was he was a poor blocker and supposedly not very good receiving out of the backfield (which I disagree with). It seems with the success of the Als under Trestman, other teams started going with the "all around" scatback types. Hence why Hugh Charles was even starting over Boyd and Messam in Edmonton.
    Boyd had good hands, but was slow in making his first move after catching the ball. If you hit him on the move he was dangerous, but from a stand still position, not as good as most backs.
    It's us vs the rest of the country

  2. #2
    Bleeds Double Blue
    Points: 66,643, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 12.0%
    Achievements:
    OverdriveCreated Album picturesVeteran50000 Experience Points
    R.J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    6,655
    Points
    66,643
    Level
    100
    Quote Originally Posted by AngeloV View Post
    Boyd had good hands, but was slow in making his first move after catching the ball. If you hit him on the move he was dangerous, but from a stand still position, not as good as most backs.
    Cornish and Messam are the same when it comes to receiving IMO, and they've had some pretty solid careers. Boyd's issue IMO is that he struggled with blocks.
    Last edited by R.J; 08-13-2016 at 05:27 PM.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts