Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 85

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Bleeds Double Blue
    Points: 18,827, Level: 86
    Level completed: 96%, Points required for next Level: 23
    Overall activity: 13.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    1,978
    Points
    18,827
    Level
    86

    Why not kick the FG?

    That made absolutely no sense at the end there. Are we taking tips from LaPolice or something? Very weird.

  2. #2
    Bleeds Double Blue
    Points: 9,726, Level: 66
    Level completed: 19%, Points required for next Level: 324
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    In the Land that Time Forgot
    Posts
    436
    Points
    9,726
    Level
    66
    And why throw deep to a very well covered receiver on third down? A least make a higher percentage play to get the first down.

    Bad game. Bad decisions. Edmonton executed better.

    The Argos made Kerry freaking Joseph look good. Geeeeeesh.......

  3. #3
    Bleeds Double Blue
    Points: 14,647, Level: 78
    Level completed: 50%, Points required for next Level: 203
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Whitby
    Posts
    2,785
    Points
    14,647
    Level
    78
    Because if they kicked the field goal Edmonton takes the ball at the 35 and runs out the clock.

  4. #4
    Boatman
    Points: 8,162, Level: 61
    Level completed: 4%, Points required for next Level: 288
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    244
    Points
    8,162
    Level
    61
    Quote Originally Posted by doubleblue View Post
    Because if they kicked the field goal Edmonton takes the ball at the 35 and runs out the clock.
    I don't know about that... I wouldn't have taken the FG either but with the time remaining and a time out, a 2 and out is probably a higher percentage then an onside kick.

    agreed, he should have just tried to run for the 1st down... it was 4 freakin yards... you don't have to go for it all at once.

  5. #5
    Bleeds Double Blue
    Points: 18,827, Level: 86
    Level completed: 96%, Points required for next Level: 23
    Overall activity: 13.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    1,978
    Points
    18,827
    Level
    86
    Quote Originally Posted by doubleblue View Post
    Because if they kicked the field goal Edmonton takes the ball at the 35 and runs out the clock.
    Huh? Edmonton got the ball back and punted right back to us after going 2 and out.

  6. #6
    Bleeds Double Blue
    Points: 17,043, Level: 83
    Level completed: 39%, Points required for next Level: 307
    Overall activity: 21.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points
    argolio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    3,621
    Points
    17,043
    Level
    83
    Quote Originally Posted by KCargosfan View Post
    Huh? Edmonton got the ball back and punted right back to us after going 2 and out.
    If we had scored a TD, we could have then gone for an onside kick. With a FG, they would surely have opted to take the ball at the 35 rather than take a kickoff.

    And just because they went two and out doesn't necessarily mean the same sequence of events would have occurred if we had made a field goal.

  7. #7
    Boatman
    Points: 8,162, Level: 61
    Level completed: 4%, Points required for next Level: 288
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    244
    Points
    8,162
    Level
    61
    1. a FG is useless without an onside kick and TD to follow...
    2. go for the TD and get the major out of the way, then get an onside kick and go for a 50+ yard FG
    3. Waters already missed a FG and looked off tonight.
    4. Kerry Joseph IS good. Don't forget he's won the grey cup and the MOP. His best days are long since gone, but coming in off the bench he's one of the top 2 or 3 backups in the league.

  8. #8
    Bleeds Double Blue
    Points: 18,827, Level: 86
    Level completed: 96%, Points required for next Level: 23
    Overall activity: 13.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    1,978
    Points
    18,827
    Level
    86
    Quote Originally Posted by tennyis View Post
    1. a FG is useless without an onside kick and TD to follow...
    2. go for the TD and get the major out of the way, then get an onside kick and go for a 50+ yard FG
    3. Waters already missed a FG and looked off tonight.
    4. Kerry Joseph IS good. Don't forget he's won the grey cup and the MOP. His best days are long since gone, but coming in off the bench he's one of the top 2 or 3 backups in the league.
    You've got to at least give yourself a chance and we didn't. Funny how Edmonton went 2-and-out and punted right back to us, then we almost scored.
    Waters hit from 50 tonight, and Kerry Joseph is not good, it's 2012, not 2007. I'll take every backup in the East over him and Glenn in Calgary.

    Quote Originally Posted by argolio View Post
    If we had scored a TD, we could have then gone for an onside kick. With a FG, they would surely have opted to take the ball at the 35 rather than take a kickoff.

    And just because they went two and out doesn't necessarily mean the same sequence of events would have occurred if we had made a field goal.
    Right, but you have to at least give yourself a chance, we didn't. And I believe we still had the timeout. Plus Joseph is their QB. If we had made a FG there's as good a possibility of a 2-and-out as not.

  9. #9
    Argo Fan
    Points: 2,175, Level: 28
    Level completed: 17%, Points required for next Level: 125
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered1000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    54
    Points
    2,175
    Level
    28
    I'd take the field goal personally. At very least, I'd try something other than basically a Hail Mary. A first down was key.

  10. #10
    Bleeds Double Blue
    Points: 11,261, Level: 70
    Level completed: 3%, Points required for next Level: 389
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Burnaby, BC
    Posts
    557
    Points
    11,261
    Level
    70

    Argos VS Eskimos. This is not good enough.

    I'm pissed. This is not good enough.

  11. #11
    Boatman
    Points: 8,162, Level: 61
    Level completed: 4%, Points required for next Level: 288
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    244
    Points
    8,162
    Level
    61
    it sure wasn't... Ray was BRUTAL tonight, by far and way his worst game as an Argo.

  12. #12
    Boatman
    Points: 5,309, Level: 46
    Level completed: 80%, Points required for next Level: 41
    Overall activity: 7.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    204
    Points
    5,309
    Level
    46
    in rays defense he was hounded all night but he also throw some bad passes . i may get hounded but i would not of minded seeing jackson in for a bit just so Ray get get a look see from the bench something i thought our QB coach was doing.Ray has been pulled from games before

  13. #13
    Bleeds Double Blue
    Points: 9,726, Level: 66
    Level completed: 19%, Points required for next Level: 324
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    In the Land that Time Forgot
    Posts
    436
    Points
    9,726
    Level
    66
    I had the same thought about giving Jackson a series. More to see if he could make something happen with his legs, or to use his stronger arm to challenge with a deep ball (depending if the OL could afford the time to go deep.....).

    I also loved the decision to do something other than QB sneak when Jackson was in there, and bingo - touchdown!!!

    Can't argue with letting Ray stay in there. You have to give him a chance to compete, and he did. He's earned the benefit of the doubt.

    Not a bad thought though.

  14. #14
    Bleeds Double Blue
    Points: 14,998, Level: 79
    Level completed: 30%, Points required for next Level: 352
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points
    Stevoman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    1,084
    Points
    14,998
    Level
    79
    Definitely blew a chance to gain some ground and put some separation between them and the Ticats before a crucial home and home. We need more TD's!!!!!!!!!!!! is this offence capable of finishing off more than 2 drives a game???

  15. #15
    Bleeds Double Blue
    Points: 8,273, Level: 61
    Level completed: 41%, Points required for next Level: 177
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    534
    Points
    8,273
    Level
    61
    at least the ice cream i had from the counter in section 119 was good...

  16. #16
    Banned
    Points: 27,855, Level: 98
    Level completed: 51%, Points required for next Level: 495
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    OverdriveVeteran25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Douro Dummer Ontario
    Posts
    5,188
    Points
    27,855
    Level
    98
    WOW!! Ray looks like shite with no help and an O Line that looks like it's lost and no one to catch a pass. I was a Barnes backer but he's useless. Watt WHO??? Carroll should just be cut now. If they ditched Boyd then this stiff deserves to be cut. Suiters going on about he hasn't stayed anywhere because of penalty issues. He gets 79 yards himself.
    Tilman is one smart GM that I would have taken in a heartbeat ove Bob Barker plus he laughing his arse off as I type this.
    As I mentioned we can be in deep crap with different issues weekly but now our D looks sad. We simply don't win on Labour Day in Hamilton and we don't win in Vancouver. Hopefully we're not sitting at 4 and 7 after the next three. Everytime I let my guard down and feel confident we SUCK! I'm po'd with this stinker.
    Esks two top pass rushers are out and they killed us all night long with the pass rush against a pylon. Then we allow a 39 year old to run free.
    Milanovich is no Trestman.

  17. #17
    Bleeds Double Blue
    Points: 9,726, Level: 66
    Level completed: 19%, Points required for next Level: 324
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    In the Land that Time Forgot
    Posts
    436
    Points
    9,726
    Level
    66
    OV said it - Edmonton was better coached, and executed their game plan. They aren't going to "wow" anyone with their offence. They will do enough to let their defense win the game. That's what they did.

    Milanovich also helped with a poor decision on third down.

  18. #18
    Moderator
    Points: 35,267, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 59.0%
    Achievements:
    Your first GroupOverdriveCreated Album picturesTagger Second ClassVeteran

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    4,506
    Points
    35,267
    Level
    100
    I was shocked by how simplistic our D looked in the fourth quarter. Pressure is great, but when three rushers come free and start pursuing the QB you know something bad is going to happen. And it did, several times.

    On O, this was Barnes' last game as a starter; Rambo will probably take his spot. I think we might also find a way to dress Mann next week too.

  19. #19
    Bleeds Double Blue
    Points: 33,961, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.5%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    6,821
    Points
    33,961
    Level
    100
    Quote Originally Posted by Nob View Post
    Sorry, to finish my post - to put Rambo and Mann in there 2 imports need to come out. Barnes has been disappointing.

    Can't take Inman out. Ditto Owens.
    Rambo is a few games away from being ready - according to one of the commentators tonight; Mann is a Barnes lite; Watt had zero passes directed his way till the last drive - seems like Ray or the OC have no use for him; time for a shake-up in the receiving corps; Bradwell should get a shot as a starting slotback IMO - but he lacks something on his resume; who else is available on the roster to try at receiver?

  20. #20
    Bleeds Double Blue
    Points: 17,043, Level: 83
    Level completed: 39%, Points required for next Level: 307
    Overall activity: 21.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points
    argolio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    3,621
    Points
    17,043
    Level
    83
    Quote Originally Posted by Wobbler View Post
    On O, this was Barnes' last game as a starter; Rambo will probably take his spot.
    If he's healthy, I wouldn't be surprised.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts