Quote Originally Posted by OV Argo View Post
Pretty good set of testing #s + good NCAA production = i bet he is the top receiver draft pick upcoming, with maybe Simoinse to challenge.

The redefine "National" debate can go on - Singleton is a good recent example. I have zero problem with any of these Canadian connection guys being declared NIs now - from a league that has continued to move to allow more import players on rosters to where they are now the majority. Not good / don't agree / total B$, etc. etc. Change the rosters to much more Canadian content - guys who were born & raised in Canada or played their minor/college ball here - they should be the majority in the CFL IMO - and then they could do away with guys like Chapman or Singleton qualifying as NIs. Not going to happen though.
You decry the reduced number of NAT starters and the fact a majority of roster players are INTs, yet you are OK with guys who are not Canadian taking jobs away from actual Canadians. Where's the logic?