Poll: What would you do?

[Wobbler]

The 2016 draft is almost upon us. Is there a guy you think we should try to get by acquiring an earlier pick? Is the draft so deep that we should "trade down" to acquire more selections?

[CFL Shark]

I'm scared to vote because if I disagree with you, you might lock the thread.

[PullTogether73]

I'm scared to vote because if I disagree with you, you might lock the thread.

New guy has balls.
Only 2 posts to date and already tossing barbs at a moderator.:ohno:

[AngeloV]

I'm scared to vote because if I disagree with you, you might lock the thread.

Love it!!

[R.J]

I voted to keep what we've got. Trading up means we would lose some of our draft picks and somehow I don't think the Riders would take our 1st, 7th and 8th in return for the 1st overall. IMO trading down means that we'd lose out on the top offensive linemen in this draft; which I'd rather not see the Argonauts do.

[AngeloV]

I voted to keep what we've got. Trading up means we would lose some of our draft picks and somehow I don't think the Riders would take our 1st, 7th and 8th in return for the 1st overall. IMO trading down means that we'd lose out on the top offensive linemen in this draft; which I'd rather not see the Argonauts do.

I had the same thoughts.

[Double Dare]

Love it!! X2

[paulwoods13]

I agree with AV and SR. I want at least the fourth-best prospect, and I don't want to reduce the number of picks we get in at least the first four rounds.

[Will]

The goal, IMO, is thinking of Van Zeyl's and Smith's replacements. We don't know what we have in Matt Sewell yet, granted, and Watman is also in camp, but that right-side of the OL had me mighty worried down the stretch last year.

What the Argos do with the draft depends on whether or not that priority can be addressed at #4 or whether it needs to be addressed at a higher spot or whether they can trade down.

[jerrym]

I voted to keep what we've got. Trading up means we would lose some of our draft picks and somehow I don't think the Riders would take our 1st, 7th and 8th in return for the 1st overall. IMO trading down means that we'd lose out on the top offensive linemen in this draft; which I'd rather not see the Argonauts do.


I had the same thoughts.


I agree with AV and SR. I want at least the fourth-best prospect, and I don't want to reduce the number of picks we get in at least the first four rounds.

Consensus is breaking out all over.

[Ron]

Well since I don't follow drafts or know the right answer ... me no abla the question.

[Argo57]

I had the same thoughts.

Agree, keep the pick.

[Wobbler]

You guys are probably right, but I'm worried that we'll end up with the "leftover" top OL.