Page 2 of 29

Re: Ottawa REDBLACKS

Posted: Sun Dec 15, 2024 7:09 pm
by Will
https://x.com/SunDoniB/status/1868405062353277020

William Fields hired as defensive coordinator in Ottawa.

Re: Ottawa REDBLACKS

Posted: Sun Dec 15, 2024 7:23 pm
by ARGO57
Will wrote: ↑Sun Dec 15, 2024 7:09 pm https://x.com/SunDoniB/status/1868405062353277020

William Fields hired as defensive coordinator in Ottawa.
Hate to see good coaches leave but good for Fields.

Re: Ottawa REDBLACKS

Posted: Sun Dec 15, 2024 7:37 pm
by ArgoRavi
ARGO57 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 15, 2024 7:23 pm
Will wrote: ↑Sun Dec 15, 2024 7:09 pm https://x.com/SunDoniB/status/1868405062353277020

William Fields hired as defensive coordinator in Ottawa.
Hate to see good coaches leave but good for Fields.
He did an excellent job in Toronto so this is a well-deserved promotion for him.

Re: Ottawa REDBLACKS

Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2025 2:15 pm
by AngeloV
So Rick Campbell going back to Ottawa as ST coordinator. I sure hope he was Bob Dyce's hire and not a forced hire by management. Smells like they are already planning for when they relieve Dyce of his duties.

https://3downnation.com/2025/01/09/otta ... or-report/

Re: Ottawa REDBLACKS

Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2025 5:27 pm
by OV Argo
AngeloV wrote: ↑Thu Jan 09, 2025 2:15 pm So Rick Campbell going back to Ottawa as ST coordinator. I sure hope he was Bob Dyce's hire and not a forced hire by management. Smells like they are already planning for when they relieve Dyce of his duties.

https://3downnation.com/2025/01/09/otta ... or-report/
A classic CFL GOB recycle job. Ricky can whisper loudly in Bob's ear i guess.

I"m surprised they didn't hire that genius Chris Jones as DC, but he has been hired by another football genius down south.

Re: Ottawa REDBLACKS

Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2025 6:42 pm
by ARGO57
AngeloV wrote: ↑Thu Jan 09, 2025 2:15 pm So Rick Campbell going back to Ottawa as ST coordinator. I sure hope he was Bob Dyce's hire and not a forced hire by management. Smells like they are already planning for when they relieve Dyce of his duties.

https://3downnation.com/2025/01/09/otta ... or-report/
You maybe onto something there Angelo, Dyce should be nervous.

Re: Ottawa REDBLACKS

Posted: Fri Jan 10, 2025 1:25 pm
by Will
The Redblacks scooped up William Stanback fairly quickly after his release by BC. A good move by Ottawa because their lack of running game may have been one of their undoings in the playoffs.

Re: Ottawa REDBLACKS

Posted: Fri Jan 10, 2025 4:21 pm
by OV Argo
Will wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 1:25 pm The Redblacks scooped up William Stanback fairly quickly after his release by BC. A good move by Ottawa because their lack of running game may have been one of their undoings in the playoffs.
Umm, gotta disagree there - the switch in the East semi, vs. the Argos, to a mostly spread offence / 6 pack / no real run game, netted almost 500 passing yards and a doubling of time of possession, vs. the Argo D that went on to win the GC. That was arguably the RedBlacks best offensive game of the season.

I thought Dyce & Condell might have wanted to continue / explore that style of offence more; but maybe not, and also good to have a quality RB at your disposal (and D. Williams, who missed all of last season with injury there, after impressing plenty the season before, could return as well ?)

BC preferring that ultra mediocre Butler over the far superior Stanback is a bit head scratching; but maybe a money thing; or maybe Rourke put in a word for Butler as he was his main RB in his big CFL season there.

Re: Ottawa REDBLACKS

Posted: Fri Jan 10, 2025 8:09 pm
by ArgoRavi
OV Argo wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 4:21 pm
Will wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 1:25 pm The Redblacks scooped up William Stanback fairly quickly after his release by BC. A good move by Ottawa because their lack of running game may have been one of their undoings in the playoffs.
Umm, gotta disagree there - the switch in the East semi, vs. the Argos, to a mostly spread offence / 6 pack / no real run game, netted almost 500 passing yards and a doubling of time of possession, vs. the Argo D that went on to win the GC. That was arguably the RedBlacks best offensive game of the season.

I thought Dyce & Condell might have wanted to continue / explore that style of offence more; but maybe not, and also good to have a quality RB at your disposal (and D. Williams, who missed all of last season with injury there, after impressing plenty the season before, could return as well ?)

BC preferring that ultra mediocre Butler over the far superior Stanback is a bit head scratching; but maybe a money thing; or maybe Rourke put in a word for Butler as he was his main RB in his big CFL season there.
Butler is a much better receiver coming out of the backfield than Stanback, IMO, so may be a better fit for the Rourke offence in BC moving forward. Butler probably made a mistake leaving BC in the first place but has now corrected that.

Re: Ottawa REDBLACKS

Posted: Fri Jan 10, 2025 8:17 pm
by OV Argo
ArgoRavi wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 8:09 pm
OV Argo wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 4:21 pm
Will wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 1:25 pm The Redblacks scooped up William Stanback fairly quickly after his release by BC. A good move by Ottawa because their lack of running game may have been one of their undoings in the playoffs.
Umm, gotta disagree there - the switch in the East semi, vs. the Argos, to a mostly spread offence / 6 pack / no real run game, netted almost 500 passing yards and a doubling of time of possession, vs. the Argo D that went on to win the GC. That was arguably the RedBlacks best offensive game of the season.

I thought Dyce & Condell might have wanted to continue / explore that style of offence more; but maybe not, and also good to have a quality RB at your disposal (and D. Williams, who missed all of last season with injury there, after impressing plenty the season before, could return as well ?)

BC preferring that ultra mediocre Butler over the far superior Stanback is a bit head scratching; but maybe a money thing; or maybe Rourke put in a word for Butler as he was his main RB in his big CFL season there.
Butler is a much better receiver coming out of the backfield than Stanback, IMO, so may be a better fit for the Rourke offence in BC moving forward. Butler probably made a mistake leaving BC in the first place but has now corrected that.

Maybe they feel Butler is a better fit; i'd also bet it was about saving some buck$, and Butler might have signed for way less than it would have cost to keep Stanback; Rourke & Betts eating up lots of ca$h there; they gotta pay new OT D. Allen now; McInnis (best receiver in the league IMO) will likely cost plenty to keep.