Page 2 of 21

Re: Kelly

Posted: Sat Jul 06, 2024 8:35 am
by ARGO57
kellynjk wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2024 10:06 pm Pissed off why - because he acted like a jerk (and not for the first time) and got called on it ! I have absolutely no sympathy for him, he brought all of this on himself by his behaviour, immaturity and bad judgement. Maybe he should focus more energy on trying to grow up and learning something from this whole experience and less energy posting stupid things on twitter.
Not really sure why this bothers you so much?

Re: Kelly

Posted: Sat Jul 06, 2024 9:04 am
by paulwoods13
Kelly, and the Argos, are under intense scrutiny over this situation. Anything he does, even a cryptic one-word tweet, is going to be magnified and a target for criticism. Tweets that sound angry or vindictive, such as "I'm taking receipts" are even more destructive to what he and the org should see as the essential task of rehabilitating his public image. The ONLY sensible approach for Kelly at this point is to keep his mouth shut -- and that includes his social media accounts -- and when he does finally surface, it's imperative that he say and do the right thing. Always, not just at his first media availability. Anything less than that will make him, and the Argos, a target for further condemnation. How the Argos haven't insisted he stay off social media is beyond comprehension.

Re: Kelly

Posted: Sat Jul 06, 2024 10:57 am
by ARGO57
Ryan52 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2024 10:27 pm ive been critical of kelly but i think this recent stuff people are trying to make a problem with is a complete non issue

with that said, i dont understand why people cant just take the report/lawsuit being settled/suspension for what it is and move on. people using the lack of release of the report and ndas being signed as a gateway to further their points of view, to slam him more or to protect him more. release your info and stand behind it or understand that your doing nothing but parroting heresay. the “i know something you dont” is nonsense and cant be verified
I suspect you would be singing a different tune if you were accused of something and convicted based on a report you or your lawyers weren’t allowed access to, just don’t ask questions take your lumps and move on I guess correct?

Re: Kelly

Posted: Sat Jul 06, 2024 11:04 am
by ARGO57
ARGO57 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 06, 2024 10:57 am
Ryan52 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2024 10:27 pm ive been critical of kelly but i think this recent stuff people are trying to make a problem with is a complete non issue

with that said, i dont understand why people cant just take the report/lawsuit being settled/suspension for what it is and move on. people using the lack of release of the report and ndas being signed as a gateway to further their points of view, to slam him more or to protect him more. release your info and stand behind it or understand that your doing nothing but parroting heresay. the “i know something you dont” is nonsense and cant be verified
I suspect anyone would be singing a different tune if you were accused of something and convicted based on a report they or their lawyers weren’t allowed access to, just don’t ask questions take your lumps and move on I guess correct?
If a suspension is levied based on a report on behalf of the league then the affected player and his representatives should be given full access to the report. Looks bad on the league and raises some serious questions about how they are handling this.

Re: Kelly

Posted: Sat Jul 06, 2024 11:08 am
by ARGO57
gilthethrill wrote: ↑Sat Jul 06, 2024 4:39 am Stop following him on social media. Problem solved.
That would make too much sense.

Re: Kelly

Posted: Sat Jul 06, 2024 12:41 pm
by paulwoods13
ARGO57 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 06, 2024 11:08 am
gilthethrill wrote: ↑Sat Jul 06, 2024 4:39 am Stop following him on social media. Problem solved.
That would make too much sense.
Not following him on social media might be easier on one's psyche, but he's not going to suddenly lose all of his followers, and some of them are going to seize on anything he does that might be interpreted as bad behaviour. Since he has shown a proclivity for saying and doing questionable things there, this just opens up him -- and the org -- to the risk of further condemnation. Hard to fathom the org being happy about that. And yet here we are.

Re: Kelly

Posted: Sat Jul 06, 2024 12:49 pm
by OV Argo
ARGO57 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 06, 2024 10:57 am
Ryan52 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2024 10:27 pm ive been critical of kelly but i think this recent stuff people are trying to make a problem with is a complete non issue

with that said, i dont understand why people cant just take the report/lawsuit being settled/suspension for what it is and move on. people using the lack of release of the report and ndas being signed as a gateway to further their points of view, to slam him more or to protect him more. release your info and stand behind it or understand that your doing nothing but parroting heresay. the “i know something you dont” is nonsense and cant be verified
I suspect you would be singing a different tune if you were accused of something and convicted based on a report you or your lawyers weren’t allowed access to, just don’t ask questions take your lumps and move on I guess correct?
So, let me guess - maybe the Chadster is some innocent victim of some sort of conspiracy in all this; even after the league did an investigation?
That type of viewpoint would be a lot more questionable IMO.

He should keep his big mouth shut; and he coulda offered a public apology that this whole mess affected the Argos. Both those things would have helped, lots.

Re: Kelly

Posted: Sat Jul 06, 2024 12:59 pm
by ARGO57
OV Argo wrote: ↑Sat Jul 06, 2024 12:49 pm
ARGO57 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 06, 2024 10:57 am
Ryan52 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2024 10:27 pm ive been critical of kelly but i think this recent stuff people are trying to make a problem with is a complete non issue

with that said, i dont understand why people cant just take the report/lawsuit being settled/suspension for what it is and move on. people using the lack of release of the report and ndas being signed as a gateway to further their points of view, to slam him more or to protect him more. release your info and stand behind it or understand that your doing nothing but parroting heresay. the “i know something you dont” is nonsense and cant be verified
I suspect you would be singing a different tune if you were accused of something and convicted based on a report you or your lawyers weren’t allowed access to, just don’t ask questions take your lumps and move on I guess correct?
So, let me guess - maybe the Chadster is some innocent victim of some sort of conspiracy in all this; even after the league did an investigation?
That type of viewpoint would be a lot more questionable IMO.

He should keep his big mouth shut; and he coulda offered a public apology that this whole mess affected the Argos. Both those things would have helped, lots.
Not saying that at all, when a player is suspended based on this investigation it should be made available to him, his representatives and the PA so that everything is transparent.
I guess wanting transparency is “questionable”?

Re: Kelly

Posted: Sat Jul 06, 2024 1:05 pm
by Ryan52
ARGO57 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 06, 2024 10:57 am
Ryan52 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2024 10:27 pm ive been critical of kelly but i think this recent stuff people are trying to make a problem with is a complete non issue

with that said, i dont understand why people cant just take the report/lawsuit being settled/suspension for what it is and move on. people using the lack of release of the report and ndas being signed as a gateway to further their points of view, to slam him more or to protect him more. release your info and stand behind it or understand that your doing nothing but parroting heresay. the “i know something you dont” is nonsense and cant be verified
I suspect you would be singing a different tune if you were accused of something and convicted based on a report you or your lawyers weren’t allowed access to, just don’t ask questions take your lumps and move on I guess correct?
im confused as to how you took my message and thought i was speaking from chad kellys point of view. im talking as a fan who is reading what other fans are saying on social media/facebook/message boards

Re: Kelly

Posted: Sat Jul 06, 2024 1:06 pm
by Ryan52
gilthethrill wrote: ↑Sat Jul 06, 2024 4:58 am
Ryan52 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2024 10:27 pm ive been critical of kelly but i think this recent stuff people are trying to make a problem with is a complete non issue

with that said, i dont understand why people cant just take the report/lawsuit being settled/suspension for what it is and move on. people using the lack of release of the report and ndas being signed as a gateway to further their points of view, to slam him more or to protect him more. release your info and stand behind it or understand that your doing nothing but parroting heresay. the “i know something you dont” is nonsense and cant be verified
Its more than just the league refusing to release the report to the CFLPA. Randy's recent handling of the Micro Chipped balls really puts into question his leadership capabilities.
no argument from me about that. the fact the report wasnt given to kelly and his team immediately is completely wrong