Page 3 of 9

Re: Montreal Alouettes

Posted: Sun Jun 01, 2025 1:18 pm
by argolio
OV Argo wrote: ↑Sun Jun 01, 2025 1:09 pm
argolio wrote: ↑Sun Jun 01, 2025 12:35 pm One courtesy drive = he showed nothing in camp.
You were there at Als TC? - I missed your reports; how many reps did Senecal get and how did he look ? Probably "weak arm strength" held him back ? :lol:
Neither were you, Einstein.

Impress the coaches or you're gone. Simple concept.

Re: Montreal Alouettes

Posted: Sun Jun 01, 2025 2:43 pm
by ARGO57
argolio wrote: ↑Sun Jun 01, 2025 1:18 pm
OV Argo wrote: ↑Sun Jun 01, 2025 1:09 pm
argolio wrote: ↑Sun Jun 01, 2025 12:35 pm One courtesy drive = he showed nothing in camp.
You were there at Als TC? - I missed your reports; how many reps did Senecal get and how did he look ? Probably "weak arm strength" held him back ? :lol:
Neither were you, Einstein.

Impress the coaches or you're gone. Simple concept.
You mean CFL coaching staff(s) aren’t screwing over Canadian QB’s in favour of fielding a weaker roster and diminishing their chances of winning a championship?
As you said impress or you don’t make it.

Re: Montreal Alouettes

Posted: Sun Jun 01, 2025 2:58 pm
by OV Argo
ARGO57 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 01, 2025 2:43 pm
argolio wrote: ↑Sun Jun 01, 2025 1:18 pm
OV Argo wrote: ↑Sun Jun 01, 2025 1:09 pm

You were there at Als TC? - I missed your reports; how many reps did Senecal get and how did he look ? Probably "weak arm strength" held him back ? :lol:
Neither were you, Einstein.

Impress the coaches or you're gone. Simple concept.
You mean CFL coaching staff(s) aren’t screwing over Canadian QB’s in favour of fielding a weaker roster and diminishing their chances of winning a championship?
As you said impress or you don’t make it.
It might be a "conspiracy" I think i heard somewhere . :lol:

But the reality is, the GMs and coaches "just want to win" and will always go with the best players - don't care if they're from Mars.

:lol: :idea: :lol:

Re: Montreal Alouettes

Posted: Sun Jun 01, 2025 3:06 pm
by ARGO57
OV Argo wrote: ↑Sun Jun 01, 2025 2:58 pm
ARGO57 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 01, 2025 2:43 pm
argolio wrote: ↑Sun Jun 01, 2025 1:18 pm Neither were you, Einstein.

Impress the coaches or you're gone. Simple concept.
You mean CFL coaching staff(s) aren’t screwing over Canadian QB’s in favour of fielding a weaker roster and diminishing their chances of winning a championship?
As you said impress or you don’t make it.
It might be a "conspiracy" I think i heard somewhere . :lol:

But the reality is, the GMs and coaches "just want to win" and will always go with the best players - don't care if they're from Mars.

:lol: :idea: :lol:
Yes they do, it’s called staying employed.

Re: Montreal Alouettes

Posted: Sun Jun 01, 2025 4:14 pm
by AngeloV
argolio wrote: ↑Sun Jun 01, 2025 1:18 pm
OV Argo wrote: ↑Sun Jun 01, 2025 1:09 pm
argolio wrote: ↑Sun Jun 01, 2025 12:35 pm One courtesy drive = he showed nothing in camp.
You were there at Als TC? - I missed your reports; how many reps did Senecal get and how did he look ? Probably "weak arm strength" held him back ? :lol:
Neither were you, Einstein.

Impress the coaches or you're gone. Simple concept.
You mean like Tre Ford?

Re: Montreal Alouettes

Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2025 10:29 pm
by OV Argo
With the Als cutting vet starting RB Fletcher, apparently the starting RB job could go to vet Sean Thomas-Erlington (he of the superior CFL career yds/ carry average);; so in addition to some SM$ savings, this could mean Erlington as the starter gets them to their 7 only need apply goal (3 interior O-line + Philpot at receiver + Erlington = 5 on offence; and then DeQuoy at safety + they have at least 3 good Canadian DEs to play in the rotation = 2 on D).

Re: Montreal Alouettes

Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2025 10:28 pm
by gilthethrill
Montreal looking dominant going 2-0 vs teams employing 2nd string QBs, with tonights win against Matthew Shiltz and the Ottawa All Blacks.

Re: Montreal Alouettes

Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2025 8:43 pm
by Will
gilthethrill wrote: ↑Fri Jun 13, 2025 10:28 pm Montreal looking dominant going 2-0 vs teams employing 2nd string QBs, with tonights win against Matthew Shiltz and the Ottawa All Blacks.
In contrast, Montreal forced to go to their 2nd stringer in Hamilton and MBT looked quite bad. The Als didn't try and run the ball all that much either.

Re: Montreal Alouettes

Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2025 10:56 pm
by TrueBlueGuy
Will wrote: ↑Sun Jun 29, 2025 8:43 pm
gilthethrill wrote: ↑Fri Jun 13, 2025 10:28 pm Montreal looking dominant going 2-0 vs teams employing 2nd string QBs, with tonights win against Matthew Shiltz and the Ottawa All Blacks.
In contrast, Montreal forced to go to their 2nd stringer in Hamilton and MBT looked quite bad. The Als didn't try and run the ball all that much either.
Overall Week 4 observation, the drop-off from 1st-string QB to backup QB, across the CFL, sure looks deeper than I had expected it would.

Re: Montreal Alouettes

Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2025 10:58 pm
by Will
TrueBlueGuy wrote: ↑Sun Jun 29, 2025 10:56 pm
Will wrote: ↑Sun Jun 29, 2025 8:43 pm
gilthethrill wrote: ↑Fri Jun 13, 2025 10:28 pm Montreal looking dominant going 2-0 vs teams employing 2nd string QBs, with tonights win against Matthew Shiltz and the Ottawa All Blacks.
In contrast, Montreal forced to go to their 2nd stringer in Hamilton and MBT looked quite bad. The Als didn't try and run the ball all that much either.
Overall Week 4 observation, the drop-off from 1st-string QB to backup QB, across the CFL, sure looks deeper than I had expected it would.
Which is why these QB injuries are so disconcerting. By my count, 5/8 teams that played this week started their No. 2's.