Interesting Analysis of Receivers

Toronto Argonauts Discussion Here

Moderator: ArgoGabe22

ArgoRavi
Posts: 1091
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2024 11:45 am

Interesting Analysis of Receivers

Post by ArgoRavi »

https://x.com/i/status/2003546361598476313

Have a look at what Cody compiled. Basic receiving stats don't necessarily tell the entire story. The Argos had an interesting mix of receivers this past season. Coxie was definitely a player that they missed over the final half of the season.
Scooter McCray
Posts: 887
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2024 3:33 pm
Location: RICHMOND HILL, ON

Re: Interesting Analysis of Receivers

Post by Scooter McCray »

It's always interesting to look at the analytics. Based upon the interpretation and weighting of what was deemed "valuable", Makai Polk and Kevin Mital were not as productive as their peers.
I like the Argos receiving corps. And think it is as good as any regardless of passports etc
Make Clemons President!!!
ArgoRavi
Posts: 1091
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2024 11:45 am

Re: Interesting Analysis of Receivers

Post by ArgoRavi »

Scooter McCray wrote: ↑Tue Dec 30, 2025 9:52 am It's always interesting to look at the analytics. Based upon the interpretation and weighting of what was deemed "valuable", Makai Polk and Kevin Mital were not as productive as their peers.
I like the Argos receiving corps. And think it is as good as any regardless of passports etc
Mital is still developing. He made great strides in 2025 and I have no doubt that he only scratched the surface. Can he ultimately become more like a Demski-type?

Having Coxie and, especially, Kelly back will help Polk's production considerably.
Scooter McCray
Posts: 887
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2024 3:33 pm
Location: RICHMOND HILL, ON

Re: Interesting Analysis of Receivers

Post by Scooter McCray »

ArgoRavi wrote: ↑Tue Dec 30, 2025 1:59 pm
Scooter McCray wrote: ↑Tue Dec 30, 2025 9:52 am It's always interesting to look at the analytics. Based upon the interpretation and weighting of what was deemed "valuable", Makai Polk and Kevin Mital were not as productive as their peers.
I like the Argos receiving corps. And think it is as good as any regardless of passports etc
Mital is still developing. He made great strides in 2025 and I have no doubt that he only scratched the surface. Can he ultimately become more like a Demski-type?

Having Coxie and, especially, Kelly back will help Polk's production considerably.
With Kelly hopefully back healthy and ready to go in week one and Coxie, Polk, Brissett, Mital, Herslow, Ungerer, and hopefully Daniels back (I'd like to see his career end on his terms) as depth and veteran leadership this unit will enter the season under the radar but full of massive potential. 4 receivers could cross 1,000 yds - Coxie, Polk, Mital and Brissett and Kelly can be a 5,000 yard QB. Would love to bring back Kadeem Carey for training camp as well and give him sn opportunity to win his job back.
Make Clemons President!!!
ARGO57
Posts: 918
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2024 10:32 am

Re: Interesting Analysis of Receivers

Post by ARGO57 »

Scooter McCray wrote: ↑Tue Dec 30, 2025 2:34 pm
ArgoRavi wrote: ↑Tue Dec 30, 2025 1:59 pm
Scooter McCray wrote: ↑Tue Dec 30, 2025 9:52 am It's always interesting to look at the analytics. Based upon the interpretation and weighting of what was deemed "valuable", Makai Polk and Kevin Mital were not as productive as their peers.
I like the Argos receiving corps. And think it is as good as any regardless of passports etc
Mital is still developing. He made great strides in 2025 and I have no doubt that he only scratched the surface. Can he ultimately become more like a Demski-type?

Having Coxie and, especially, Kelly back will help Polk's production considerably.
With Kelly hopefully back healthy and ready to go in week one and Coxie, Polk, Brissett, Mital, Herslow, Ungerer, and hopefully Daniels back (I'd like to see his career end on his terms) as depth and veteran leadership this unit will enter the season under the radar but full of massive potential. 4 receivers could cross 1,000 yds - Coxie, Polk, Mital and Brissett and Kelly can be a 5,000 yard QB. Would love to bring back Kadeem Carey for training camp as well and give him sn opportunity to win his job back.
Will be nice to see Miller put his own stamp on the both the offensive system and in game play calling, having said that it wouldn’t shock me to see them move on from Daniels, perhaps he would make a good receivers coach someday?
19X World Champions
ArgoGabe22
Posts: 191
Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2024 10:46 am

Re: Interesting Analysis of Receivers

Post by ArgoGabe22 »

Scooter McCray wrote: ↑Tue Dec 30, 2025 2:34 pm
ArgoRavi wrote: ↑Tue Dec 30, 2025 1:59 pm
Scooter McCray wrote: ↑Tue Dec 30, 2025 9:52 am It's always interesting to look at the analytics. Based upon the interpretation and weighting of what was deemed "valuable", Makai Polk and Kevin Mital were not as productive as their peers.
I like the Argos receiving corps. And think it is as good as any regardless of passports etc
Mital is still developing. He made great strides in 2025 and I have no doubt that he only scratched the surface. Can he ultimately become more like a Demski-type?

Having Coxie and, especially, Kelly back will help Polk's production considerably.
With Kelly hopefully back healthy and ready to go in week one and Coxie, Polk, Brissett, Mital, Herslow, Ungerer, and hopefully Daniels back (I'd like to see his career end on his terms) as depth and veteran leadership this unit will enter the season under the radar but full of massive potential. 4 receivers could cross 1,000 yds - Coxie, Polk, Mital and Brissett and Kelly can be a 5,000 yard QB. Would love to bring back Kadeem Carey for training camp as well and give him sn opportunity to win his job back.
I don't know if Carey is the answer, didn't he get injured?, but I think it was evident that the Argos needed a bigger back. A bruiser type rather than a shifty RB as their everydown back.
ArgoRavi
Posts: 1091
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2024 11:45 am

Re: Interesting Analysis of Receivers

Post by ArgoRavi »

ARGO57 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 30, 2025 2:40 pm
Scooter McCray wrote: ↑Tue Dec 30, 2025 2:34 pm
ArgoRavi wrote: ↑Tue Dec 30, 2025 1:59 pm

Mital is still developing. He made great strides in 2025 and I have no doubt that he only scratched the surface. Can he ultimately become more like a Demski-type?

Having Coxie and, especially, Kelly back will help Polk's production considerably.
With Kelly hopefully back healthy and ready to go in week one and Coxie, Polk, Brissett, Mital, Herslow, Ungerer, and hopefully Daniels back (I'd like to see his career end on his terms) as depth and veteran leadership this unit will enter the season under the radar but full of massive potential. 4 receivers could cross 1,000 yds - Coxie, Polk, Mital and Brissett and Kelly can be a 5,000 yard QB. Would love to bring back Kadeem Carey for training camp as well and give him sn opportunity to win his job back.
Will be nice to see Miller put his own stamp on the both the offensive system and in game play calling, having said that it wouldn’t shock me to see them move on from Daniels, perhaps he would make a good receivers coach someday?
As much as I like Daniels, I think the time is probably right for the Argos to move on from him. He is 33 and coming off of an injury-plagued season.
ArgoZ
Posts: 92
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2024 3:30 pm

Re: Interesting Analysis of Receivers

Post by ArgoZ »

ArgoRavi wrote: ↑Tue Dec 30, 2025 9:18 pm
ARGO57 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 30, 2025 2:40 pm
Scooter McCray wrote: ↑Tue Dec 30, 2025 2:34 pm
With Kelly hopefully back healthy and ready to go in week one and Coxie, Polk, Brissett, Mital, Herslow, Ungerer, and hopefully Daniels back (I'd like to see his career end on his terms) as depth and veteran leadership this unit will enter the season under the radar but full of massive potential. 4 receivers could cross 1,000 yds - Coxie, Polk, Mital and Brissett and Kelly can be a 5,000 yard QB. Would love to bring back Kadeem Carey for training camp as well and give him sn opportunity to win his job back.
Will be nice to see Miller put his own stamp on the both the offensive system and in game play calling, having said that it wouldn’t shock me to see them move on from Daniels, perhaps he would make a good receivers coach someday?
As much as I like Daniels, I think the time is probably right for the Argos to move on from him. He is 33 and coming off of an injury-plagued season.
With Coxie, Polk, Herslow, Mital, and hopefully Brissett returning, Daniels has fallen to far down the depth chart to warrant a vet salary. Much like Eric Rogers time here, one year it’s all over, that’s pro ball.
primetime321
Posts: 174
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2024 8:03 pm

Re: Interesting Analysis of Receivers

Post by primetime321 »

ArgoGabe22 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 30, 2025 8:30 pm
Scooter McCray wrote: ↑Tue Dec 30, 2025 2:34 pm
ArgoRavi wrote: ↑Tue Dec 30, 2025 1:59 pm

Mital is still developing. He made great strides in 2025 and I have no doubt that he only scratched the surface. Can he ultimately become more like a Demski-type?

Having Coxie and, especially, Kelly back will help Polk's production considerably.
With Kelly hopefully back healthy and ready to go in week one and Coxie, Polk, Brissett, Mital, Herslow, Ungerer, and hopefully Daniels back (I'd like to see his career end on his terms) as depth and veteran leadership this unit will enter the season under the radar but full of massive potential. 4 receivers could cross 1,000 yds - Coxie, Polk, Mital and Brissett and Kelly can be a 5,000 yard QB. Would love to bring back Kadeem Carey for training camp as well and give him sn opportunity to win his job back.
I don't know if Carey is the answer, didn't he get injured?, but I think it was evident that the Argos needed a bigger back. A bruiser type rather than a shifty RB as their everydown back.
I think that last season showed that McMahon as good as he is, isn't built to be an every down back. Hopefully Miyan Williams can bounce back from injury to at least compete for a starting job in camp. With the exception of William Stanback, all of the other free agents have been resigned (or about to be in AJ Ouellette) so other backs will have to be recruited down south. There are a couple who are very interesting on their neg listings, Damien Martinez and Cody Schrader, who is very similar to AJ Ouellette. Both were recently signed to NFL practice rosters but that might change in the off-season.
User avatar
paulwoods13
Posts: 1062
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2024 9:06 am

Re: Interesting Analysis of Receivers

Post by paulwoods13 »

primetime321 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 02, 2026 6:12 pm
I think that last season showed that McMahon as good as he is, isn't built to be an every down back. Hopefully Miyan Williams can bounce back from injury to at least compete for a starting job in camp. With the exception of William Stanback, all of the other free agents have been resigned (or about to be in AJ Ouellette) so other backs will have to be recruited down south. There are a couple who are very interesting on their neg listings, Damien Martinez and Cody Schrader, who is very similar to AJ Ouellette. Both were recently signed to NFL practice rosters but that might change in the off-season.
Has Greg Bell re-signed with Hamilton? I'd be interested in seeing him in camp here.
Post Reply